>>214649194
That’s exactly the kind of reply that pops the whole balloon. Because once you point out how arbitrary the cutoff is, the moral grandstanding collapses.

In the U.S., 21 is the sacred “adulthood” line because of drinking laws.

In most of Europe, it’s 18. In some places, 16.

In others, people marry at 14–15 with parental consent.

So what’s the argument then? Is a relationship fine in Berlin but predatory in Boston? Does the morality of a kiss depend on whether the couple crosses a state line? The femcel script falls apart once you realize it’s not about universal principles — it’s about whatever arbitrary line the local DMV or liquor board set.

That “What now, bitch?” jab cuts right to the point: if your entire moral framework rests on whether someone can legally order a vodka cranberry, then you don’t have a moral framework. You have bar culture masquerading as ethics.