>>515443043
>You stated this and refused to elaborate further because either 1) you don't have an argument for it or 2) it's not true
jesus christ, this is exhausting. I showed you that red vs blue is a red herring, that is NOT the distinction that predicts criminality in a given location, it is the percentage of the population black and/or hispanic that predicts this regardless of the overall political leanings. Why is this hard for you to grasp? I knew this intuitively over a decade ago before ever seeing the stats. Places like New England, Montana, North Dakota are the places with the lowest amount of crime and the highest percentage of Whites - New England is very blue and I believe ND and Montana are red. Louisiana is a red state but has the highest percentage of niggers compared to the total - lots of nigger crime here, anon.
>socioeconomic factors, environmental factors
just obfuscation. Its genetics. The environment and socioeconomics are downstream of genetics because
>see picrel
the richest nigger community has a higher crime rate than the poorest White community. Poor Whites and asians outscore wealthy niggers on all standardized tests as well.