>>718732221
>it's because they feared they were losing what they perceive as a battle of culture due to progressive culture in companies and immigration
It's the opposite. The left lost the culture debate, which primarily relied on emotional arguments, rather than logical
>diversity is our strength
>race is only skin deep
>correlation does not equal causation
>if were kind and give them better chances they'll be just like us eventually
>borders are unnecessary
>immigration is good, we're a melting pot
This has all been proven wrong, diversity has destroyed social cohesion and community, and caused massive friction between races/cultures/religions, its a weakness, not strength, immigration has suppressed wages and nearly destroyed the middle class, as well as destroying the bargaining chip the worker has against companies, but it made companies and gdp rich.

The eradication of racism and attempts to unify has only led to the racism in the extreme to the other side against whites, the abandonment of religion has led to complete degeneracy and cruelty and the making of neo-religions, like progressivism.

The cultural debate has been completely lost by the progressive left, and they've also abandoned almost all their original positions of standing for the workers, freedom of speech, liberty, etc, to control the narrative and prevent open dialogue which proves how badly they've lost in this sphere. So they exerted control, of everything they had. Internet, games, government, social media, radio, anything they could. The complete failure to market progressive leaning products is a reaction of the silent majority rejecting the cultural tyranny the progressive left has tried to push in lieu of dialogue.