>>96336660
>If a corrupt evildoer enacts a law to feed the starving, is it suddenly a bad law?

If a known corrupt evildoer, who is known for making corrupt and evildoing laws and things suddenly throws some random ass good law that feeds the starving, I can guarantee you that was not the intention. In fact doing surface level and cheap good things while doing really nasty shit behind closed doors is par for the course in political corruption.

Even if he wanted to have some change of heart, nobody would believe him.