>>11351455
> If this girl is going to emotionally collapse without you, then I guarantee you she will emotionally collapse with you, too.

I'm still not sure of exactly the right way to say this, and I appreciate your concerns about just how abusive that whole practice sounds, but I feel like the goal of a relationship like that is still to self-actualize the slave into being happy to be alive, while trying to prevent the worse case scenario of her not being able to live without Master.

Different people experience this in different ways, and I have a bad habit of pushing my rather extreme interpretation of kink on people unknowingly, but I seriously believe there are a lot of people who need that acceptance that this is the kind of person they are, so that they can get attached to someone who can help build them up.

Ive also got a bit of the same personality of getting really stuck on people just from the opposite end of the lifestyle. That may influence my thinking a lot. To be clear I am not celebrating the fact that a girl like that would very clearly be completely dependent, just that there's plenty of people like that who I don't think have a path to sanity without someone to be dependent on and shape that in a positive way. This is just, y'know, my kind of type. In a slavery world I would run a slave psychiatry practice.

>I think it would be hot to be forbidden from wearing clothes entirely as long as there's no health risk.
Yeah that's like #1 item on the list of being a domestic slave to me.

Disrobe immediately upon entering Master's home, you're just a thing, not even a animal, why would you be expected to be gifted anything beyond what is absolutely necessary? It'd be great for a slave to only have seen the inside of Master's home a scant few times if at all fully clothed before being accepted into service and having to fold up her clothes next to the front door every time.