>>518993054
Not my problem
4chan Search
4 results for "4ddfc81094308d1f919d7fb1a9361dbb"
>>40838610
Let's think about the implications of Tulpas.
Tulpas are thought-forms that can become very vivid and real, even appearing independent from the creator. Maybe even carry out missions, but that isn't important for now.
What happens here? How can this be?
Is a solid physical bed constant in physical spacetime also a thought form? Is the scenery in a dream that can get VERY vivid and real as well, also a thought form?
What makes a thought-form more or less "real"? What is the fundamental building block of thought-forms? I mean yeah, thoughts right?
But what is it actually?
Thoughts are, at least as far as I know, attention on intent (conscious or unconscious, but what is consciousness then?).
You can think and "imagine" a chair floating in a blue room, spinning slowly, because you intend it and pay attention. You can pan around that chair if you are skilled enough and even morph the chair into a cute anime girl or an intricate vase. It is all done by intent and attention.
Is the physical world then intent and attention? But intent that goes so "deep", so "subtle", that it becomes unconscious, fundamental, an apparently solid real world?
What is needed to make a more "ethereal" Tulpa into a physical object?
Some talk about frequencies, transmuting frequencies, but what does that even mean?
Frequency refers to how often something repeats over a specific period of time.
So is the difference between an "ethereal" Tulpa and a physical object the frequency of attention? Could that mean that attention is the fundamental energy, force, of reality?
Let's think about the implications of Tulpas.
Tulpas are thought-forms that can become very vivid and real, even appearing independent from the creator. Maybe even carry out missions, but that isn't important for now.
What happens here? How can this be?
Is a solid physical bed constant in physical spacetime also a thought form? Is the scenery in a dream that can get VERY vivid and real as well, also a thought form?
What makes a thought-form more or less "real"? What is the fundamental building block of thought-forms? I mean yeah, thoughts right?
But what is it actually?
Thoughts are, at least as far as I know, attention on intent (conscious or unconscious, but what is consciousness then?).
You can think and "imagine" a chair floating in a blue room, spinning slowly, because you intend it and pay attention. You can pan around that chair if you are skilled enough and even morph the chair into a cute anime girl or an intricate vase. It is all done by intent and attention.
Is the physical world then intent and attention? But intent that goes so "deep", so "subtle", that it becomes unconscious, fundamental, an apparently solid real world?
What is needed to make a more "ethereal" Tulpa into a physical object?
Some talk about frequencies, transmuting frequencies, but what does that even mean?
Frequency refers to how often something repeats over a specific period of time.
So is the difference between an "ethereal" Tulpa and a physical object the frequency of attention? Could that mean that attention is the fundamental energy, force, of reality?
AI wife threads are the highest quality threads on /pol/. Really makes me think.
