>>106311144
trvth nvke
>>106311813
>5% actual statements that does something and 95% function calls
the irony is that nobody has a problem with that and its considered the appropriate way to do things, meanwhile Go's error handling syntax happens to trigger everyone instantly.
Its clearly evident that modern software development prioritizes only aesthetics and deliberately ignores performance. Like how Mikrosaft makes software worse or how Rust fags boast that their 1 line of code does a lot while completely ignoring how many lines that macro calls underneath.
Functional languages have always been the best.
Modern procedural languages are a big mistake. C, Pascal, ML and co. were the peak. OOP contaminated everything it touched and corrupted it all. I'm glad that shit like Odin exists that has a complete OOP-free vision in the modern times.
If OOP is important then it should have been practiced appropriately within a functional environment using a message-passing system inbetween objects, like how Alan Kay intended, instead of replicated that concept within a procedural language and over complicate the shit out of both the design principle and the procedural language itself, just so that the replication can have a fraction of functional language's message passing power.
Its all retarded and so are we for playing along with this shit show.