Search results for "4e2e691f32a5628a847ff45498fd24aa" in md5 (2)

/pol/ - COUNTDOWN: Nick Fuentes vs Andrew Tate, debate in 20 minutes
Anonymous United States No.513063721
>>513063206
>Trump said FUCK YOU to Bibi during the same him. Literally said “fuck him”.
Yes, Trump felt scorned by his boss, but he crawled right back to him like the buckbroken shabbos goy he is.

In the past 6 months, Netanyahu already visited the White House three times to give him his marching orders.

Trump is the Likudnik president, and, with Israel facing an existential crisis with October 7th, he's who they needed. He had all the major jewish donors, including ones who previously backed democrats, like Bill Ackman, and got more of the jewish vote than any Republican since Reagan.

>>513063636
You philosemitic invaders ruined this board in 2015.
/pol/ - Thread 509974009
Anonymous United States No.509983605
>>509982954
>You might want to rethink that one.
lol, that's pre-October 7th. The ADL is MAGA now.

>At this point you're not even trying to have a coherent argument. You're literally answering the idea that Israel doesn't want to draw attention to itself with "but Epstein!"
Because it was a Mossad blackmail operation, it's very, very simple. Even a redditor should be able to grasp it.

>You're deliberately ignoring that he was one of the few people whom helped get Epstein arrested in the first place, even though there was absolutely no fallout to any of the other celebrities that denied help.
That was a civil suit, the statement you're alluding to was from 2019, then a year later, he wrote in his book about discovering Trump and Epstein were "closer than he was made to believe". That's what I quoted.

>If he meant it, he wouldn't have helped get the guy arrested.
Again, he didn't. That was a civil case, and he lied up distance himself from Epstein.

>No, just them trying to draw connection to her claims and status as an Epstein victim to MAGA. They don't want to outright state "Trump is a pedo" because they don't want to be responsible for libel. They want to breadcrumb their readers to that trail.
That's retarded. The whole point is that she's been interviewed by every media outlet that covered Epstein, and NONE of them ran what she said.

Here she is saying as much:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7N9YBvyYJR87

>With this postulate, one question: is the media pro or anti-Trump?
Like any politician, some jewish media outlets support him, others are against him, but none of those anti-Trump outlets ran anything Maria Farmer said about Trump - because implicating jews and Israel is off the table.