>>723136326
>where did I ever say ATB is bad
>See>>723135187 (You)
>>On top of the game having pretty bad graphics and animations, here's the standout features of the game and all of it could have just been turn-based. Nothing would have been lost. It's a turn-based game in a 3D environment. Their big revolutionary idea is Active Time combat which hasn't been a new idea since the Super Nintendo.
>nothing in this sentence says that ATB is bad or even a bad thing to include.
Okay, I'm going to write this off as being trolled by a third worlder using an AI to communicate, because this is officially too silly to entertain. I asked for you to find where I said ATB is bad, and on the contrary- you just showed me the post I made that said ATB is GOOD. I LIKE FF4. I even said I like FF4. I also said a 3D pokemon game still stealing concepts from the SNES is a bad thing for a game that tried to pitch itself as a revolutionary new design.
FF4 had its 34th anniversary recently. This isn't revolutionary or new. Nintendo has tricked you into thinking this is new combat, and what they gave you looks terrible. Actual FF4 sprites would look better than what Nintendo sold to you for 80 dollars.
>That's how English works anon,
You need a refund to whoever 'taught' it to you, then.