>>105905040
>>105905326
You don't need much to outperform JPG especially the sea of JPGs that have NOT been encoded with jpegli.

Will a 1488-bit AVIF look nicer? Yeah, no duh but the one that can be hardware accelerated will load in 0.0001 seconds on a modern toaster so yeah.

I dunno about JPG. Could the new jpegli encoder really replace the old turbo-shit one?

WELP there you have it folks. At least when cartoons are involved Webp achieves around 50% better compression efficiency against the old libjpeg-turbo JPG encoder and around 30% better compression efficiency against the new jpegli JPG encoder. So while jpegli has made very impressive gains, I don't see Webp going away in the near future.