>>520811893
He also qualifies his takes with:
1. He hasn't studied it in over 20 years, and new information may well have emerged.

2. He's not an "expert" on the events.

3. There must always be room left for even complete denials of something that "accepted fact", because that is the only intellectually honest way to look at anything.

>he could, yet, be Holobunga pilled
>#WeCanSaveHim