>>516059340
IT'S CALLED TROLLING, KEKSERVATIVE

>>515783116
God doesn't like homosexuals or Zionists.

>>515794202
No one here is going to kill to avenge charlie kirk.

>>515792824

Charlie Kirk is not the basis for civil unrest, but the glowies want him to be. It is being shilled hard enough.

The glowies don't understand what kirk represented, and so they think they can both murder kirk, and make his death the casus belli they need to thin the ranks in the surplus male population. Make no mistake about the outrage farming, that's the purpose. But the whole point of kirk was the idea that
>we can talk our way out of this
So now that they've killed him, they want to flop the wcript and make all his followers into an ad hoc militia. But they only followed him because the kirk types are the definition of that favorite of glowie insults:
>you won't do shit
They aren't going to do anything because they are looking for an excuse to do nothing. That's why they liked him, because he promised that they could talk their way out of what they'd permitted.

The only people who might "do shit", are the ones who hate, not rando civilians, but specific elites, whom they hold responsible. They are types like
>luigi mangione
>Ted kaczinski
>Robert Matthews

(i'm using luigi as an example, im not even sure he really did it)

These types aren't looking to commit random acts of senseless violence, but it's these types that the glowies are hoping to 86 with their civil unrest plan.

Enter project Zyphr. If you haven't looked into it yet, project Zyphr is a supposed plan to kill off political dissidents during state orchestrated civil unrest. So if you have been speaking out of turn, then according to the theory, you can expect your own when the lights go off.

Expect that if they really go through with it you'll have BLM mobs of useful idiots clearing a path and making noise while Mossad or whatever goes around offing white leadership candidates. So watch your backs frens.

>>515633786
Preposterous, if kirk was a raging homosexual, there would have been clues, BIG GAUDY SEQUIN COVERED CLUES, he would have made a public specticle of his closeted homosexuality, and it would be impossible to deny.

Radical Centrist Charlie kirk is supposed to be our George Floyd. And like George Floyd anf the left, Kirk represents everyrhing wrong with Right wing.
>fake
>perverse
>without moral compass
>promotes homosexuals
>shields his degeneracy in christian sloganeering
>invokes emotional reasoning
>pretends to be traditional
>undermines his own party
>promotes jews
>promotes immigration

Kirk is meant to be like George Floyd. You're meant to want to do something, and have a fight or have the government create a new TSA. There is othing inspiring about Kirk, and he didn't represent anything, any more than Megan Kelly does, but the jews are desparate.

The idea is that people are going to march or protest in the streets with posterboard signs scrawlled over with
>we love you charlie

But no one, save for paid protestors, are going to show up. These protests are going to be as authentic as Patriot Front.

I'd say to stay safe, but the 'riots' and 'demonstrations' will be difficult to sustain when no one can thing of a single thing the man did that mattered. Aside from bringing a tranny to Trump rallies.

That's my bet on the killer, btw, is that Lady MAGA did it. Charlie promised to run away with him Dog Day Afternoon style, and then backed out at the last minute and left Lady M at wqiting in his lengere to run off to fire island, anyway he went ballistic and the rest is history.

Bottom line: i'm not fighting a civil war to avenge the memory of a zionist faggot promoter

>>515629766
What do you think his take would have been on Kirk featuring Lady Maga at TPUSa?