>>60807148
>As predicted, he dodged the question.
Naked shorts create synthetic longs. It's not the not responsibility of the estate or the court to adjust a payout to properly account for all of the longs. The short sellers must pay the difference. Hence why there is no possible way the share cancellation means anything. The judge even stated himself that the cancellation can be addressed.
You don't even have a plausible response worth addressing, which shows how comically flimsy the whole idea is in the first place.