I'd like there to be some further discussion about the enforcing of rules and policy on /his/.

This isn't to gripe about the board. I've actually been pleasantly surprised at the amount of civil, informative discussion and content shared through the board. However, I think it can still improve. As new events occur, we can all be aware and stay on the same page.

For now, I'd like to talk about the problems from people posting 'Religion' in /his/. Religion (as one of the humanities) is not against the rules to discuss, but I think religion in this context should be emphasized as something to be discussed in an 'academic' setting. What I have been seeing more and more often is extremely low-quality name-calling arguments and behavior. I don't think 'worship' threads or attempts at religious conversion would be considered on-topic, or any of the "peripherally religious-related" threads, which end up as 4chan users using religion as an excuse to shitpost and flame other users.

Very frequently, I would almost say daily, the same few threads get posted on /his/: "Which religion is objectively correct" or "is X religion more degenerate than Y religion?" I have been getting rid of these threads, but because i haven't talked to any mods in depth about the bounds of the policy I'm not sure how far i should be going.

More threads that seem to pop up every day, unrelated to /his/
>STEM-major hate threads
>threads dedicated to Atheism and science
>threads dedicated to making fun of Atheists and science
>was this country historically a black culture or a white culture?

Another thing I would be interested in hearing clarified is the degree to which political ideologies should be discussed. One one hand, study of ideology in the past is undoubtedly a part of history, but on the other hand many, many posters prefer to use ideological labels as buzzwords and spout console-war-like gibberish about them

Any answers from the mod team or other input would be appreciated.