>>49868337
>even then she only gave the link when asked
This is still a very delicate line to walk, if bullshit can happen from me just not saying anything fast enough then I'll never be able to recover if I actually do something stupid on my own terms. Linking it when people ask just seems courteous, otherwise just find it yourself and I won't say anything if I don't have to.
>>49868215
>one of those special isolate artists i forget the name but theres a special term for them
I believe you're talking about "Outsider" art which I'm also pretty fond over for how raw its sense of individual expression can be by nature.
>alfter all anyone can imagine any art in their mind but to bring it forth into the reality you intentionaly must share and the act ot creation is the means to share
Art and writing are the closest things we currently have to sharing exactly what's in our own mindscapes with others in a relatively normal and highly-accessible way without the use for much more than paper and its related tools. Tools which would be nothing without the very minds to have conceived of their multiple uses in the first place of course.
In the words of a certain goddess, "Create!"
>the best way to avoid this fate is always try to think criticaly baout anything. and most things have something to think criticaly about
Depth. Without it, culture would be shallow and society would somehow be even less rich (not the fiscal kind) than it's become today. Good points about copyright too, I'm pretty quick to say that originality is overrated when this topic comes up but that isn't to advocate for total creative homogeneity obviously.
Those movies weren't bad for the time as well, and Spongebob can be funny in the right dosages.