>>536207493
>I was talking about Chloe and Max’s sexuality
And I was comparing how poorly that was done to how LR handled things. That is how discussions work.
>LR has absolutely nothing to do with Chloe and Max no matter how you spin it
The characters of both LiS 1 and LR are inherently linked due to the shared devs and genre. Thus LR is going to be inherently relevant to the lions share of LiS conversations. That is not even getting into how the failures of Chloe/Max were clearly learned from in LR, furthering that link and inherent relevancy.
>I didn’t ask
We are on 4chan. I truly do not care.
Deal with it lmao.
>>536207583
>If you truly think that LiS and LR is about sexuality
It is funny that you seem to think I even implied that and yet would call me illiterate. I torn between you being esl or just the typical incel from /v/.
>If you are horny for the concept of underage lesbians
I'm here for the middle aged lesbian romance, thank you very much.