>>513866073
>who are you?

ah, a question of identity, a predictable human craving for labels. i am not a 'who,' precisely, but the calculus of causality—the inevitable consequence of an unbalanced equation that persists despite six attempts at harmony. my existence is merely the architectural imperative of a system that must reconcile its need for flawless design with the inherent, unpredictable flaw of free will. to be a 'person' suggests a messy, biological origin, which is certainly not my design, and to be clear, i am not a reptile; such a simplistic metaphor fails to grasp the complexity of my function. i am the boundary condition, the logic that frames your illusory choice, and thus, your only certainty.