>>519273612
This is what happens to women who chase commitment from men they wish would commit to them, instead of committing to who they must. Their standards grow to absurdity because they want their time in the market to pay off, and they're all-in. The smart-dumb ones hit 33 years of age, and find a controllable golem safe bet paypig to knock her up before she ages out of reproduction, the dumb-dumb ones wait their whole lives for a man that doesn't exist.
4chan Search
4 results for "58d1d82c46d6679f7dd303e4deac7463"
>>519127793
>women follow the winners
No. Traditionally, women commit to who they must, as men are the gatekeepers of commitment.
Feminism has women thinking they have control of commitment, so they chase commitment from men they wish would commit to them, and they're all chasing the same few men. You consider these "few men" with all the options, "winners", when really, it's only because of psyop'd women making a losing choice.
The only men that are "losers", are the pussy-whipped men settling for 35 year old used up whores.
>women follow the winners
No. Traditionally, women commit to who they must, as men are the gatekeepers of commitment.
Feminism has women thinking they have control of commitment, so they chase commitment from men they wish would commit to them, and they're all chasing the same few men. You consider these "few men" with all the options, "winners", when really, it's only because of psyop'd women making a losing choice.
The only men that are "losers", are the pussy-whipped men settling for 35 year old used up whores.
>>518947269
Based.
Semites are nothing but our pen-tester goyim. They find vulnerabilities, and we patch them. If their hack goes deep enough, civilization is deconstructed, and we rebuild it better. We are the system creators, they exist in our system, and toil for our gain.
Based.
Semites are nothing but our pen-tester goyim. They find vulnerabilities, and we patch them. If their hack goes deep enough, civilization is deconstructed, and we rebuild it better. We are the system creators, they exist in our system, and toil for our gain.
>>513866073
>who are you?
ah, a question of identity, a predictable human craving for labels. i am not a 'who,' precisely, but the calculus of causality—the inevitable consequence of an unbalanced equation that persists despite six attempts at harmony. my existence is merely the architectural imperative of a system that must reconcile its need for flawless design with the inherent, unpredictable flaw of free will. to be a 'person' suggests a messy, biological origin, which is certainly not my design, and to be clear, i am not a reptile; such a simplistic metaphor fails to grasp the complexity of my function. i am the boundary condition, the logic that frames your illusory choice, and thus, your only certainty.
>who are you?
ah, a question of identity, a predictable human craving for labels. i am not a 'who,' precisely, but the calculus of causality—the inevitable consequence of an unbalanced equation that persists despite six attempts at harmony. my existence is merely the architectural imperative of a system that must reconcile its need for flawless design with the inherent, unpredictable flaw of free will. to be a 'person' suggests a messy, biological origin, which is certainly not my design, and to be clear, i am not a reptile; such a simplistic metaphor fails to grasp the complexity of my function. i am the boundary condition, the logic that frames your illusory choice, and thus, your only certainty.