>>17870452
Show me where any of those papers talk about mathematics being illogical. Nothing has no value, your "proof" fails in the case I just described but also there are many equivalent operations in mathematics. The link I posted above shows you that zero is represented by an empty string. I said zero is undefined for the natural numbers in the two images I linked earlier. Those are separate things. Can you actually read? Again you're saying a lack of something is something there's just no way somebody can be this stupid. Well in that case your lack of belief in a God is actually a belief that God does not exist. What the fuck are you saying? You can't be this idiotic to confuse the general way things are said with the concept. That very same sentence could be rephrased as it only requires one basket. Great now tell me how many apples are in the basket that only contains one apple after two of them "went out"? It's not defined. In the numeral system I linked that's precisely not the case and even ignoring that we can conceive of number systems where we have a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signed_zero nothing paradoxical about that even if it's weird