>>533571727
Like most yes, but enza was doing pretty well before then.

>>530182682
I mean, enza didn't do so well this past year so this was totally expected. I'd rather have them pander than enza ending service early.

I don't know if anyone posted this yet, but since it's related to enza
>43% decline in profit from last year

https://gamebiz.jp/news/408041