>>106302167
I like this syntax. If you are making a language, I would also like it if you modified your operators slightly so that whenever you are checking conditions, x = 5 means x == 5. Or just use something other than = for assignment operator so = can always mean equality.

>>106242584
Thank you for telling me. I will post it when the Science Computer gets out of storage. I would like it the most if Laurie puts on a maid outfit and discusses the works by Ralph Griswold.

>>106243582
Thank you. I renamed the project from MAID-LISP to MAIDS because the more I worked on it the less it was a list processor and the more it is a string processor. This happened because the library gave me all their SNOBOL4 books. The name is still an acronym.