>>514936049
Tell that to a hyperventilating feminist, or the male simp politician seeking a tough on crime reputation by cracking down hard on 'child sexual abuse'.
You live in a world that is irrational, run on women's emotions, that are exploited by losers looking for votes and money.
> but it's just a drawing
And they'll be taking more of your rights away tomorrow, to please women. Because average men, the kind who look at lolicon, are not only 'sexually dangerous' but low tier creeps who, in their eyes, do not deserve human rights. So you can't take away enough rights from such people.
That's why there will never be a point where a rational balance is struck. Because we're dealing with women's feelings, not reason.

>>510796456
A society that has turned the majority of its young men against it will not survive. It's one thing to have a racist society that keeps low IQ browns down. But even that's incredibly expensive. But when the high IQ earners no longer feel loyalty to your country because they can't make a family, can't have sex, don't have kids? That's suicide.
America is committing suicide to politically simp for women who are putting back into the system less than 10% of what they take out. The kids they raise are dysfunctional, and they leave an army of angry and frustrated men in their wake.
Here is the solution
> No education for women beyond 14, unless highly qualified (hi IQ)
> Married before 18
> Place is home and church (even an atheistic fake church will do)
> Paternity tests always
> Respect given ONLY to mothers
But let's be honest, our politicians have another solution in mind:
> make up a fake war
> women white feather men
> force angry young men to die there
> kill millions of young men
> import more browns
> profit off slave labor
> replace liberalism with brown tribalism
> throw white civilization into the garbage
All because men were too afraid to say no to women.