>>150310423
I told you I didn't post it, booster.

>Why are you talking about ten years, when your own (uncited and unread) source speaks of more than twenty? Which also given potential reasons for such rise in cancer diagnoses?
Because I didn't know it was 24 years.

>Are you not familiar with how culture and lifestyles have changed since 2000?
I am but it's pretty broad. Which of those changes do you think have contributed to an escalation of cancers in 30 or 40 year olds? You can just post a few if you like and if you answer that it will be my final question.