>>24677305
>When YOU read Heidegger you see "Man is fallen into beings" and go "what the fuck am I supposed to do with this?," but when THEY read Heidegger they are already post-Kantian subjective idealists who have followed Heidegger's introductory etymology and breakdown of the Greek terms logos and ta phainomena to explain the value of phenomenology for a better neo-Kantian hermeneutics, and had multiple "ohhhh!" moments, and so when he gradually introduces his special vocabulary (being, beings etc.), they follow it without problems
Isn't this exactly why the analytical philosophers despised continentals?