2. Epstein’s Own Statements on “Dirt”:
• In a 2018 off-the-record conversation with a New York Times reporter, Epstein implied he had compromising information on powerful people, including details about their sexual proclivities and drug use. This aligns with retired FBI agent Paul Hutchinson’s explanation that Epstein traded in “kompromat” (compromising material) to gain influence through untraceable deals or contacts. This statement, combined with seized materials, suggests Epstein may have intended to use collected data for leverage, a key component of blackmail.
3. Evidence Inventories and Potential Leverage:
• A three-page evidence catalog from searches of Epstein’s New York, Palm Beach, and U.S. Virgin Islands properties, released in the “Phase 1” DOJ disclosure in February 2025, lists 40 computers, 26 storage drives, over 70 CDs, six recording devices, and physical items like photographs, travel logs, and employee lists. These materials, especially the digital data, could theoretically contain compromising content, though the DOJ emphasized much of it includes victim identities or child pornography, necessitating redactions. The catalog’s mention of “court-authorized intercepts” of Ghislaine Maxwell’s phone also hints at monitored communications that could reveal attempts to manage or exploit relationships with elites.
• The Vault’s 22 parts include heavily redacted reports (e.g., FBI “302” forms from witness interviews), which obscure details about high-profile associates. The redactions, justified to protect victim identities and uncharged individuals, fuel speculation that sensitive information about potential blackmail targets is being withheld. For instance, the 2008 Florida civil case by Epstein’s victims against the FBI provided critical evidence, but much remains sealed or redacted, limiting clarity on whether it included blackmail-related material.

2. Epstein’s Own Statements on “Dirt”:
• In a 2018 off-the-record conversation with a New York Times reporter, Epstein implied he had compromising information on powerful people, including details about their sexual proclivities and drug use. This aligns with retired FBI agent Paul Hutchinson’s explanation that Epstein traded in “kompromat” (compromising material) to gain influence through untraceable deals or contacts. This statement, combined with seized materials, suggests Epstein may have intended to use collected data for leverage, a key component of blackmail.
3. Evidence Inventories and Potential Leverage:
• A three-page evidence catalog from searches of Epstein’s New York, Palm Beach, and U.S. Virgin Islands properties, released in the “Phase 1” DOJ disclosure in February 2025, lists 40 computers, 26 storage drives, over 70 CDs, six recording devices, and physical items like photographs, travel logs, and employee lists. These materials, especially the digital data, could theoretically contain compromising content, though the DOJ emphasized much of it includes victim identities or child pornography, necessitating redactions. The catalog’s mention of “court-authorized intercepts” of Ghislaine Maxwell’s phone also hints at monitored communications that could reveal attempts to manage or exploit relationships with elites.
• The Vault’s 22 parts include heavily redacted reports (e.g., FBI “302” forms from witness interviews), which obscure details about high-profile associates. The redactions, justified to protect victim identities and uncharged individuals, fuel speculation that sensitive information about potential blackmail targets is being withheld. For instance, the 2008 Florida civil case by Epstein’s victims against the FBI provided critical evidence, but much remains sealed or redacted, limiting clarity on whether it included blackmail-related material.

If you have the will to power then you might want to look into dealing drugs and becoming a pimp.

If you have even a small stable of whores and some coke then you will be in a position to blackmail your friends in a position of power.

It doesn’t matter how principled they May seem. Apparently they will hop into bed with anyone. If you have barbiturates then even better.

I overlooked this post and it seems like a legitimately good argument (maybe the same Sage leaf) for me even though it is from a past thread.

The argument reads to me: don’t talk about the blackmail ring because it gives power to the blackmail ring. In a big way though he’s right.

>>513060043
>>513032598 (OP)
I told people yesterday in the art thread. They're just scared mortals vying for immortality, and to expose people to their crimes is to give power to the ritual. Nothing they do is secret, it's all foreshadowed and implied one inch from view, by design. And so they are contained, as are the entities they create, but to talk about them specifically is to allow others to conceptualize them; the betrayal and juxtaposition is traumatic enough to count as a ritual to just about anyone exposed to "the truth", again, by design. And so their Gods will be born. Then how do you fix it? You cant stop them; that requires transparency, which conjures the God, or covertly destorying a vast interconnected network of people essential to society, which fucks up the world. Therefore they're permitted to do these things in secret, and the power they recieve is limited massively.

>>512819132

The video is wild. Vatican, Big Pharma, Drug trade.