>>17976018
>I don't think any theistic denomination thinks that way.
Literally every Abrahamic religion denomination thinks this way.
>The more common view is that He sets pieces in motion but then goes "hands off."
No, this isn’t common at all, and most Abrahamic faiths would have burned you at the stake for saying such things at one point or another.
>Obviously I can't ask you to prove any of this one way or another, which really shines the spotlight on how subjective this all is.
Yeah, it’s called fucking religion. It’s all subjective and unproveable. That’s the point.

Where does /his/ find you retards? OP was clearly trying to address the “Fall of Man” issue in Abrahamic religion which entails that all evil in the world is the result of Eating the Apple. A lion eating a zebra has nothing to do with the “Fall of Man,” so it appears, in an Abrahamic framework, that god designed the zebra to suffer for no real reason despite there being infinitely other ways to design the animal kingdom.

Nobody cares about your hippy dippy bullshit. OP is addressing the primary religions that govern most of humanity and governments across the world.