>>215218717
Let's put it this way, why is there something, rather than nothing? Something cannot, by every law of our world, come from nothing. If something cannot come from nothing, then logic takes to the path there should be nothing and our universe should be an empty void. This is similar to your assertion.

But, however, the complete nothing means that there is also nothing that says that something cannot come from nothing, for there is nothing, including laws of a world. So something can come from nothing, until something that forbids it comes from the nothing.

A lack of inherent meaning means there is no meaning that says a meaning cannot come from that which has no meaning. The difference between the meaning coming from a mind which considers there to be nothing with meaning and something coming from nothing is but that in one case the universe is the universe and in other the universe is the mind.