>>82129990
>Didn't trump get reelected in a landslide? Seems like pretty good proof by your standards even though its not proof at all and is instead a red herring
Trump never even heard of the word "incel" anon. Nothing in his platform is about enabling males to get more sex. He'd be utterly embarrassed by your inability to.

Where did he ever even talk about this issue?

>So a bunch of incels owned you and now you roam r9k typing paragraphs on end about how bad they are?
See there you go, he actually thinks incels are owning anyone.

You go do that anon. I'll go back then to sip on your tears. I guess the threat is back on track again. Ahahah,
Keep it coming.