>>82834247
i think the problem with this line of thinking is what exactly is human and animals?
maybe the lines are supposedly clear right now, but historically they werent. blacks historically were not human. does that mean that slavery was right when blacks were not human?

what about the evolutionary link between the great apes and humans? such beings died hundred of thousands of years ago, but what if we got their dna and revived them?

would it be okay to kill and eat them?

it just sounds like you conveniently pick a point in the line thats self-serving (humans) which is very convenient because it allows you to kill sentient animasl like pigs, which are more intelligent than the average 3 year old