>There would be no legal recourse to sanctuary because the UK would withdraw from international treaties and conventions that grant protection to refugees. The European court of human rights would have no say. The universal principles it upholds would be expunged from domestic statute, to be replaced by custom-made British rights. And in that category, there is only one entitlement Farage holds sacred – the freedom of the settled British population to live unmolested by the phantom multitude of foreign criminals posing as refugees.
>By calling his plan Operation Restoring Justice, Farage is hinting at future redress for the grievance, much aired in radical rightwing circles online, that police and courts operate “two-tier” policies with a systemic bias in favour of immigrants. The inference is that courts might be used as instruments of nationalist restitution, dismantling liberal multiculturalism, putting native-born Britons first.
I've got an erection.
>The problem each time has been the same. A bill that repudiated international treaties would signal Britain’s withdrawal from the community of reliable democracies, sabotaging diplomatic relations and burning alliances.
This is nonsense. It would have no impact at all outside of the UN and international charities.

Oh, god, this article just took a funny turn. Do you want to know what his solution is? Attack Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/aug/27/nigel-farage-keir-starmer-brexit-truth