>>536203483
Okay but why are they retarded enough to expose this information to the client? Genuinely what reason would the client EVER need to know this? It's hilarious they introduced this in their attempt to curb stalking, only to make it 1000x worse for anyone that actually wanted to stalk somebody.

The fact they addressed it like this instead of just, you know, making the field private, just shows that there's some critical malfunction on their team communication.