>>58205351
>Absolutely not. I can buy them dying but accusing a Pokémon of the deed is pushing their branding.
It's not like the franchise had methods that were depicting them in a more questionable manner but then again, it was portrayed to be done by humans. I don't understand how they refuse to commit to the idea that Pokemon can't be inherently bad despite being elevated to the same level as the humans in the Pokemon world. That includes the good and the bad.