>>106235492
Thanks anon, I get that. I just didn't see the benefit of spending twice the money for a worse performing accesspoint where my ISP is capped at 1.6 GPS. No need for 10gig wifi, so I run at 2.5gps. Which I can only saturate if I sit underneath the access point with my latest Lunar Lake laptop that has the best god damned client wifi antenna on planet earth (Lenovo Yoga 258v)

/g/ likes to shit on Ubiquiti but they use top tier hardware on their access points. Look at the u6e I have, 2x2 2.4 ghx, 4x4 5ghz, 4x4 6ghz with a Qualcomm IPQ5018 chipset.

Only commercial Cisco AP's have better hardware and require a lot of $$$$ goy-license fees to access remotely.