(Repost for new thread)

Implementation of such measures would be greatly facilitated by some common points of agreement between multiple /a/ janis as well as the mods. I'll put some thoughts on this here but it's all up for discussion/cross pollination as I seek common ground between ourselves on when/how to act.

>1.) /e/ and /c/ content
To me, a thread qualifying for delete/move here has a pattern of earmarks:

a.) The OP is not trying to talk about specific series, genres/motifs or industry stuff. One or more of the following subjects is stated somewhere in the OP (title or text body) - feet, ass, boob/dfc, traps, tomboys, gyarus, dom, brown girls, christmas cakes, imoutos/oneesans. E.G "Imouto thread", "draw a boy, call it a girl", "would you a tomboy" etc. These should be obvious indicators, but, some threads won't have them yet clearly are (or became) /e/ / /c/ dumps. Very likely delete.

b.) If it isn't obvious enough from the above, if it's otherwise a dump then also delete. To me for example, if at a glance much more than half of some thread comprises blank text fapbaits keeping with that OP's stated theme, it's a dump. Sometimes, such threads will have people posing semi-aimless/rhetorical questions or making flat statements alongside the images they're dumping, but if it's just this and no actual topical conversation going, then it's also a thread delete.

c.) It is on the other hand definitely possible (not super common, just possible) for a stale dump thread to turn into something interesting and get a topical conversation going. Sometimes a dumper will stop and the users will pick up the thread and make something of it. That's fine, I would likely leave it up it it's obvious that the thread is now topical. Perhaps due to inherently not being interested in board-relevant specifics, it is very common for dump threads to contain lots of blogging, so be sure a conversation is truly topical; if not then do BR the bloggers before deleting thread.

>cont.