>>938769366
I somewhat agree with this. They say men are more disagreeable and women are more conforming but I think that's only superficial reading of their dichotomy.
Men are disagreeable when it comes to law-abiding affairs, especially if they find the law unjust.
Women are disagreeable when it comes to social affairs. At least when they feel they're faced with the choice between conforming for safety and disagreeing for freedom.
A lot of women are in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation in regards to their sexuality. Men want women who are good at sex but for women to be good at it, they need to have a decent amount of it. However, this would label women as "sluts." The same logic applies to the whole BBC thing.
Women will be labeled a "coal-burner" if they fuck a black guy. Coal-burner being a label for a type of race-traitor. However, simply fraternizing with a black guy could still have her labeled as a "nigger-lover" which is functionally the same thing in regards to damaging her reputation. So now she makes a choice. Carry the label without the fun (interracial sex) that comes with it or not. Obviously she's going to go all in if she'll be labeled anyway, right?
