Move the whole planet's industry to the moon so it can have a co2 it's magic climate change will melts the moon's core to create magnetism so it creates a viable atmospheric conditions to kickstart it's terraforming process

Strategic Concept: Non-Nuclear Neutralization of National Infrastructure

Iran currently possesses an estimated electrical power generation capacity of approximately 90 gigawatt-hours (GWh). Should Israel seek Iran’s unconditional capitulation, there exists a potential strategy that could achieve the psychological and infrastructural impact of nuclear warfare—without the use of nuclear arms.

Proposed Phased Strategy:

On the first night of operations, Israel would target and eliminate roughly 10 GWh of Iran’s fossil fuel-based power generation infrastructure—primarily gas and oil facilities. The immediate consequence of such an action would be to effectively regress Iran's energy capabilities, and by extension, much of its economy and civil infrastructure, by approximately five years.

Following this, a 48-hour window would be allowed for Iran to offer unconditional surrender. If no such terms are met, another 10 GWh of energy capacity would be systematically destroyed. This cycle would repeat, incrementally dismantling the country’s energy backbone and compounding economic and societal regression, until surrender is achieved.

Strategic Implication:

Through this methodical degradation of essential infrastructure, Israel could theoretically replicate the strategic outcome of a nuclear strike—crippling the nation’s functionality and will to resist—without the attendant humanitarian and geopolitical fallout of actual nuclear deployment.

Discussion:

This proposal raises critical questions regarding proportionality, international law, and the ethics of targeting civilian infrastructure. Nonetheless, as a thought experiment or strategic contingency, it outlines a pathway toward achieving maximal coercion with ostensibly conventional means.

Anon seeks opinions. Any opinions?

Strategic Concept: Non-Nuclear Neutralization of National Infrastructure

Iran currently possesses an estimated electrical power generation capacity of approximately 90 gigawatt-hours (GWh). Should Israel seek Iran’s unconditional capitulation, there exists a potential strategy that could achieve the psychological and infrastructural impact of nuclear warfare—without the use of nuclear arms.

Proposed Phased Strategy:

On the first night of operations, Israel would target and eliminate roughly 10 GWh of Iran’s fossil fuel-based power generation infrastructure—primarily gas and oil facilities. The immediate consequence of such an action would be to effectively regress Iran's energy capabilities, and by extension, much of its economy and civil infrastructure, by approximately five years.

Following this, a 48-hour window would be allowed for Iran to offer unconditional surrender. If no such terms are met, another 10 GWh of energy capacity would be systematically destroyed. This cycle would repeat, incrementally dismantling the country’s energy backbone and compounding economic and societal regression, until surrender is achieved.

Strategic Implication:

Through this methodical degradation of essential infrastructure, Israel could theoretically replicate the strategic outcome of a nuclear strike—crippling the nation’s functionality and will to resist—without the attendant humanitarian and geopolitical fallout of actual nuclear deployment.

Discussion:

This proposal raises critical questions regarding proportionality, international law, and the ethics of targeting civilian infrastructure. Nonetheless, as a thought experiment or strategic contingency, it outlines a pathway toward achieving maximal coercion with ostensibly conventional means.

Anon seeks opinions. Any opinions?