>>50210115
Not really. The fumble was including her from the start, because the idea of abortion being a "murder" in the first place is still heavily debated even now. As soon as she was included, it was conclusively decided by Milgram's system that the "life" inside of her was "killed", it effectively concluded that abortion is murder, no two ways about it, and Yuno is the one who caused it to happen, intentionally or not. If people aren't able to accept that premise, then they wouldn't be willing to look past even the surface of her case.
Something that people theorized early on was that the prisoners' murders were either intentional or unintentional, and they're paired off that way as well. The ones who kill with their own hands are judged for their culpability as much as the ones whose actions led to someone's death. They didn't have to intend to kill someone to be viewed as responsible for it.
That's why Yuno's "murder" being a miscarriage is no different from Futa's "murder" being his doxing of the middle schooler or Mahiru/Kazui apparently driving their lovers to suicide. Agency doesn't matter when they're still considered the main trigger that led to a death. I think this is even hinted at by the way they're arranged in akka's first anniversary drawing. I'm willing to bet Kotoko's being judged not for her vigilantism victims but rather because she somehow accidentally ended up getting the girl who hangs around her killed. Whereas Mikoto is the one who directly committed his murder, with John's existence trying to muddle his culpability.