>>939413632
Nice try, but that’s not how technical language works. In philosophy and theology, terms have precise meanings that often differ from colloquial usage—just like ‘mass’ in physics doesn’t mean the same thing as ‘mass’ in everyday speech.

I’m using the philosophical and religious definition of faith: trust or confidence grounded in reason and evidence, not blind hope. You’re attacking a strawman by insisting the everyday, oversimplified definition is the only valid one. Words can have multiple valid meanings depending on context; dismissing centuries of philosophical usage just because it differs from the popular understanding doesn’t make my argument wrong.