>>718462041
>in completely divergent and mutually incompatible ways demonstrates precisely just how much of a meaningless buzzword it is
It just means all of it is bad, and different people find different shit to complain about.
>Also lol @
@ this game and IP, it seems, if what you said here is true:
>I remember telling someone in the first game I was going to stuff an object up his arse the size of Elminster *and* his hat
It just means it was a shit game which was babby's first crpg which means nostalgia instead of actual quality. If the first BG games were similar to this one, there's a reason there won't be anymore games with this IP.
Who the fuck wants to play capeshit humor game instead of playing a game in which you can immerse yourself because it's not written by chucklefucks who think this shit writing is peak entertainment? Even harry potter took itself more seriously than the writers did with this game, that's why it was a success. The wink'n'nod tier writing with r*ddit humor desperately needs to be brought behind a shed and be put out of its misery.
>You've got elderly siblings, ye fokin' wizerd?, asked the feminist troll woman
>HUE HUE HUE, U'RE GONNA SAY SUMTIN' NAUGHTY AREN'T YA?? HUE HUE HUE? replied the bearded r*ddit man.
>WE KILL CHILDREN WHEN WE DON'T NEED EM AND YOU'VE GOT ABORTED FETUS ENERGY EHEHE!!
Somebody on the writing team thought this was peak humor.