>>513297198
>members and the VP of companies advocating for ID and biometric verification belong to a board that oversees Roblox to safeguard the kids,
>There are many boards actually, the most important is called FOSI
>The board does a shit job, and Roblox, a game where 50% of the population is kids with less than 13 years old, is full of groomers
>Now the same people who fail to take care of Roblox properly are advocating for the introduction of ID and biometrics using Roblox as a pretense
>ofcom in the UK, which introduced the law for ID and censorship, did so after a feasibility study with Roblox for age verification
>Attorney General Liz Murril sued Roblox
>Liz Murril also wrote the bill for ID laws
>the association of various big tech Netchoice, has tried to fight against ID laws in Louisiana, but got laughed in the face because their lawyer made up fake cases using AI. The problem is that 2/3 of Netchoice are also on the board of FOSI, which wants ID laws, and are the same people.
> Is NEtchoice really fighting against ID laws, or is it a performance? That AI fiasco was pretty convenient, amirite?


tldr: People who want ID verification and censoring of the internet are failing on purpose to moderate Roblox as they want to create scandals and political theatre to gain political consensus and pretenses to pass ID laws.
They are absolutely disgusting pieces of shit and predators abettors