>>3983769
Except this isn't about indoctrination, anon. It's a simple matter of "does liking [x] change my sexuality" or "does liking [x] mean I was always homosexual?" We spent decades arguing whether homosexuality was a cause of nature or nurture, environment or genes. Ultimately, it doesn't necessarily matter which way because sexuality can be "fluid" dependent on multiple factors. But saying such a blanket statement such as "liking shota must mean you're gay" only hinders progress and expression. I didn't realize my love of cute boys until my late 20's, and since then I've gone on dates with my female coworkers. What am I supposed to conclude from this? Am I bisexual? No, because I'm not sexually attracted to men, either. It's all very fascinating and frustrating at the same time.