>>24692472
hurr reread this statement aloud and maybe you'll realize you sound like a tryharding pseud durr
>>24692478
>what does the post-Joyce revolutionized novel mean to us now?
Nothing because you didn't read it and what you did read you didn't understand.
>>24692548
>Joyce and Pynchon acted alone and were originals to the point they had no influences
This is true. Technically. He took -a- technique from Dujardin. Dujardin didn't do that.
>>24693389
Emily Dickinson, for example. Woolf was a trust fund band. And a mid one at that.
>>24693393
Woolfsie never surpassed making watercolor cartoons with speech bubbles and thought bubbles.