>>11367984
>not forced to breed or have nonconsensual sex
>made a choice to protect their "bodily autonomy"
Consent being a core feminist ideal being mocked in this way cause these women "chose" this is something they shouldn't be allowed to forget.
Like maybe these women are allowed to keep their honorific titles(Dr, Prof, etc.) and even diplomas/awards too.
Just imagine the juxtaposition with all these academic achievements being displayed on the wall or in glass cases while she's selling her body and serving as a sex toy for men.
Pleasure house menus show off their women like it's a university staff list, except there's also listed rates for sex acts and what type of stuff they consent to.
All just "salt in the wound" type stuff to mock them!

>must make enough to pay for their room and board
That sounds like the perfect way to push these women further into depravity and break any "red lines" they set for themselves.
It's a exclusive sex club for the rich, small group of clientele makes it easy for the to conspire to boycott a escort till her rent is due.
And out of desperation she'll say "yes" to things she wouldn't otherwise, till this new low becomes the norm.

Also kind of wondering what happens to women if they fail to pay her fees?

>transition to patriarchy gradual humiliation
Note on further hamulating feminists; women's reproductive rights is one of their pillars so these threads focus a lot on pregnancy/breeding.
Could see a setting where birth control or abortion still available but it's all controlled by men "cause they know best"(paternalism).
Feminism said it'd free women but it's turned into tools for masters to control their slaves.