>>513508563
First of all, I haven't checked if your related pic is accurate reporting since it's just some random headline apparently (with sensationalist editing in that picture), but you don't seem to understand the word "pedophilia" and sound easily programmable, like you've been hypnotized to violently react to such news without giving it much thought, like a normie. A man is not necessarily a pedophile for feeling sexually attracted to a woman who's one month away of reaching whatever legal age the government deems for women, such as if the new age of consent was 21. One century ago and earlier it was normal for men to marry "damsels" and "maidens" but now it is normal for women to behave like prostitutes on OnlyFans to keep the feminist Sexual Revolution going, and then turn into old hags, and such words have disappeared from daily usage.

A globohomo-type government won't question you feeling attracted to an old, feminist hag nor a member of the LGBT+ cult because that benefits the depopulation agenda. Younger women are naturally more fertile and this is a scientific fact, just like it is a historical fact that men could marry younger women a century ago and earlier. I'm not defending child sexual abuse which is very different from what I'm arguing.

A man feeling attracted to a woman who's one month away from turning 18, 21 or whatever age the government considers legal for human sexuality (disregarding natural development), is not a pedophile because those women are not real children. 16 still falls under legal age of consent in many places around the world and it has been like that for years and decades.

Would you denounce sodomy as a mortal sin and Pride marches (where there are much higher rates of child sexual abuse)? I think you should if you're not a hypocrite.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5311708/

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4615-7207-7_23