>>28630040
>that 1 model year
No, these were platforms. This was an era where you could either buy a trim that had a preset list of parts or you could fill out a checklist that gave you anything that could fit on the platform in any configuration. There are, in fact, factory 4-door muscle cars. It's not about it being "iconic," it's about (You) arguing over a typo that was corrected literally the next post and wasn't even wholly incorrect in the first place.

Also, how the fuck are you going to talk about "iconic muscle cars" while mentioning fucking PORSCHES AND DATSUNS? Those are FOREIGN SPORTS CARS.