>>24600477
Thats true. Underneath the cornea (film) you have a blackness named the pupil. It's not the pupil that reflects the image because blackness doesn't reflect anything, but the cornea that reflects a visible image because of its slippery sleek surface. If you look into a mirror with the blackness of the eyes you are looking into six blacknesses with four distinct images, all of which are robed into the blackness of the eyes in the real image combined with two eyes in either space, the blackness of the eyes in the real man, the blackness of the eyes in the mirrored man, the blackness underneath the surface of the mirror, and the blackness in front of the surface of the mirror according to the mirrored man. The image across the two eyes combines to form a single image, while the image reflected off the mirror adds no information about depth but only size (as decided by relative position). The angle of incidence is the same as the angle of reflection. So if you imagine a line from your pupil to the image and another line from the mirror to the image, they converge at one point. That point is the position of the real object whose light is being cannibalized by the eye baal.

The real confusion in this situation is the fact that there are not two but four images to consider: the two sets of real images, and the two imaginary mirrored images. We use our eyes to see light coming from objects, yet we can't see light itself because it tries to pass through us as though we were transparent and it gets eaten by the rods and cones to make shape. In a mythical sense as the Greeks/Romans would understand it, the eye is a deadly laser, but working in reverse, like a tractor beam.