>>519740368
>it's funny how once china's unparalleled success became undeniable it become fascist/capitalist in the eyes of wectoids
>>519740445
1. Still uses and relies on money.
2. Still uses and relies on fiat currency but mostly fictional yet spendable fiat currency.
3. Still has banks.
4. Still has an economy which largely operates for financial profit, which is a jewish lie which only seems possible because of perpetual geometric expansion of the supply of fiat currency but, really, mainly the supply of fictional yet spendable fiat currency.
5. As a result, still has inflation. Which robs from workers and savers and rewards borrowers and spenders and buy to renters.
6. Still has suboptimal allocation of resources and labour. See the ghost cities and the teardown of freshly built apartment buildings.
China is indeed capitalist. It's just that it's not fully pozzed, fully kiked capitalism.

>>519498767
>he doesnt think it is possible to have a Nation-State that upholds the interests of its VOLK
No, I don't. Certainly not a state which has money, banks or capitalism as its social order or socioeconomic system. Point to historical or contemporary examples which prove me wrong and let me know how long they lasted. Of course, ethnic homogeneity is a requirement. It should go without saying but nothing seems to be able to go without saying these days.