>>9033472
The most annoying part is that it makes the signal/noise ratio worse when actually going to look for any adult content. Every platform now has generic image sets of the same character 300 times in very slightly different situations. Basically unbrowseable now without "filter ai" checked.

The problem isn't that AI diaper art sucks, we've always had terrible diaper art. It's that so much of it can be produced so quickly that instead of scrolling past 10 terrible images per good one I see 50 terrible images per good one.

If people only posted the good images that come out of the porn-o-matic robot I'd be fine with it but instead they post the good and the mediocre. Pic related is fine while ones like >>9032362 >>9032072
>>9032068 >>9033093 are terrible to the point where I wonder why they were even posted.