>>1836758
i was more annoyed by you disregarding how i specified i had only joined recently and posting something that almost entirely took advantage of things i wouldn't have beyond the welfare and the common, which wasn't very helpful, so all i said was 'this really isn't helpful'.
your reaction was to start spazzing out, which comes across as being personally offended some clear you grabbed that you didn't even do was worthless advice compared to other generalized suggestions that other anons have given me. which it is. I would genuinely have rather had broad strokes advice like 'just use some sorcerers' or stuff like the token thing that one guy suggested than 'here's a bunch of stuff you dont own, also you dont need to do this'.

also that anon isn't even me so your reaction to someone else telling you (a lot more politely than i would've) that you shouldn't overreact so much was to sperg out and think we're the same person.
i mean i was kinda half-joking when i called you a retard at first but i think you might actually be one now.