>>520456656
>/chug/ what are your thoughts
A blockade is an act of war and was solved by Russia explaining it to them the last time.
This is indicative of the fact the Ukraine is lost and the goal of extending Russia, as in make them waste money and resources on the military instead of the economy, is still unchanged.
So a new front is needed.
This means we will see attempted flairups all around Russias perifery, in particular in Europe due to the division of labor goal.
So Lithuania attempting a blockade, Estonia harassing Russian ships, Moldova attempting to subdue Gagauzia and Transnistria and why not some shit in Serbia?
Putins restraint is the cause of this since the EU sees it as him being a cuck. Oreshniks in Rammstein (or wherever the Ukraine War is coordinated) would be a decent slap on the wrist, or an anti piracy operation in the Baltic sea based on US model outside Venezuela.
This is a language they understand.
4chan Search
12 results for "6a2fef6add5da367f907143f0e1dd3bd"
>>515002898
>Looks like were going to attack Venezuela.
I haven't seen anything that indicates a capability to invade.
We are talking about a limited strike capability.
Perhaps enough to support a successful regime change.
Here is the list I have:
>The U.S. has deployed at least eight warships and one submarine to the eastern Caribbean:
USS Gravely
USS Jason Dunham
USS Sampson
USS Iwo Jima (<1800 soldiers)
USS San Antonio (<700 soldiers)
USS Fort Lauderdale (<700 soldiers)
USS Lake Erie
USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul
USS Newport News
It's enough to attack La Isla Orchilla and dos Mosquises (two more or less uninhabited islands that could be staging ground for something larger). Maybe even la isla Tortuga.
The problem though is that Venezuela can reach these islands.
But this is what the US has the capacity to do.
It would leave 3200 soldiers for 2-3 uninhabited islands, each a few sqkm.
>Looks like were going to attack Venezuela.
I haven't seen anything that indicates a capability to invade.
We are talking about a limited strike capability.
Perhaps enough to support a successful regime change.
Here is the list I have:
>The U.S. has deployed at least eight warships and one submarine to the eastern Caribbean:
USS Gravely
USS Jason Dunham
USS Sampson
USS Iwo Jima (<1800 soldiers)
USS San Antonio (<700 soldiers)
USS Fort Lauderdale (<700 soldiers)
USS Lake Erie
USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul
USS Newport News
It's enough to attack La Isla Orchilla and dos Mosquises (two more or less uninhabited islands that could be staging ground for something larger). Maybe even la isla Tortuga.
The problem though is that Venezuela can reach these islands.
But this is what the US has the capacity to do.
It would leave 3200 soldiers for 2-3 uninhabited islands, each a few sqkm.
>>537799653
It's a bit sad, but still better than someone else making 9 robot copies of himself just so he could spend an eternity seething over Nous existance.
It's a bit sad, but still better than someone else making 9 robot copies of himself just so he could spend an eternity seething over Nous existance.
>>513465470
>What do you think about floating houses?
Nice, affordable and in most locations pretty good.
Typically the foundation is either maintenance free pontoons or unsinkable (low/no maintenance) concrete barge.
Steel hulls need to be pulled up once every 5 years for new anodes, the other two... maybe once every 25 years you'd need some proper inspection.
I'll try to answer more in the other bread.
Largest cost is for docking, getting water and land power is more expensive than for a villa.
If you are on a smaller lake or river, esp sweet water, just go for it.
If you get it on the coast exposed to the winds and high waves.. consider another location.
If you are on pintoons, ensure enough ventilation (equivalent to crawl space) underneath. Personally I would prefer unsinkable concrete barge over one with a basement (simply due to not having to worry about any cracks).
>What do you think about floating houses?
Nice, affordable and in most locations pretty good.
Typically the foundation is either maintenance free pontoons or unsinkable (low/no maintenance) concrete barge.
Steel hulls need to be pulled up once every 5 years for new anodes, the other two... maybe once every 25 years you'd need some proper inspection.
I'll try to answer more in the other bread.
Largest cost is for docking, getting water and land power is more expensive than for a villa.
If you are on a smaller lake or river, esp sweet water, just go for it.
If you get it on the coast exposed to the winds and high waves.. consider another location.
If you are on pintoons, ensure enough ventilation (equivalent to crawl space) underneath. Personally I would prefer unsinkable concrete barge over one with a basement (simply due to not having to worry about any cracks).
>>512017628
>They always end up losing in the end or very quickly
It's an interesting dynamic comparable to large corporations.
They have the financial mass if you will to fail over and over again (like Microsoft), but they still end up growing regardless.
At least up until ~2015, when the mutt empire actually stopped growing and since then has started shrinking (as BRICS expands and former allies turn away from them).
And right now we are in the parasitic end phase where they extract all wealth they can from their vassals (making more of them turn away).
>They always end up losing in the end or very quickly
It's an interesting dynamic comparable to large corporations.
They have the financial mass if you will to fail over and over again (like Microsoft), but they still end up growing regardless.
At least up until ~2015, when the mutt empire actually stopped growing and since then has started shrinking (as BRICS expands and former allies turn away from them).
And right now we are in the parasitic end phase where they extract all wealth they can from their vassals (making more of them turn away).
>>511410160
>I think we can all agree that for a person that is not very well versed on cyrillic letters or slavic languages penits is close enough
I think that was 8/10.
10/10 if you can get some pro Ukrainian channel/media to post it as well.
>I think we can all agree that for a person that is not very well versed on cyrillic letters or slavic languages penits is close enough
I think that was 8/10.
10/10 if you can get some pro Ukrainian channel/media to post it as well.
>>511306132
Ayy
Ayy
>>509843360
>SAM AA missiles and anti-ship missiles
I have proposed exactly that in previous threads under the name ULP, universal launch platform.
As far as targeting systems goes it's quite simple if you approach it with a server architecture.
If there are specific interfaces required for launch preparation, this could be integrated in the "pods" using something like an arduino that converts the standardized data packages.
Ballistics calculations, triangulation, tracking etc are all low compute operations and a typical laptop is enough.
Adding new missiles and weapon systems would thusly only require a software patch (which could be hotloaded from the pods arduino) since all communication and interface to the pods is standardized (say weather proof USB with an optional bayonett coupling) expanding on this basis would be fairly straight forward. Preferably using an open architecture.
Post launch communication will ofc be locked to whatever antennas and radios the vehicle has installed, so any updates there would either have to be on a central C4i unit or a hardware install. But that would be pretty rare.
>SAM AA missiles and anti-ship missiles
I have proposed exactly that in previous threads under the name ULP, universal launch platform.
As far as targeting systems goes it's quite simple if you approach it with a server architecture.
If there are specific interfaces required for launch preparation, this could be integrated in the "pods" using something like an arduino that converts the standardized data packages.
Ballistics calculations, triangulation, tracking etc are all low compute operations and a typical laptop is enough.
Adding new missiles and weapon systems would thusly only require a software patch (which could be hotloaded from the pods arduino) since all communication and interface to the pods is standardized (say weather proof USB with an optional bayonett coupling) expanding on this basis would be fairly straight forward. Preferably using an open architecture.
Post launch communication will ofc be locked to whatever antennas and radios the vehicle has installed, so any updates there would either have to be on a central C4i unit or a hardware install. But that would be pretty rare.
>>509072157
Spiders are friends, you can pat them.
Spiders are friends, you can pat them.
>>508673875
Hi, why the name rem contractor?
Hi, why the name rem contractor?