>>29731866
>>29731858
>so racemixing is cringe when women do it but based when men do it?
glad you asked. it depends. racemixing can be based or cringe for either gender but it depends on the reason why. if you're blindly racemixing because you hate yourself, hate your parents, or are otherwise just at odds with the (solid) culture and values you come from then that's cringe.
but if you're racemixing strategically because men or women within your race have shitty values or you'vr found them broken in some significant way it is based.
lemme give you an exmaple you might be able to better understand: it is BASED for black men AND women to date OUT of their race because MOST black people have SHITTY value systems like zero accountability for individual responsibility, tolerance for crime/violence in their communities, and having kids out of wedlock like its nothing, and just otherwise being a menace to society.
So but the thing is East Asian values are widely correctly understood to be superior, even to western values in some sense regarding work ethic and family for example. if you're race mixing towards DEGENERATION or shitty values, then you're cringe. if you're racemixing towards GOOD values, then you're based.
i'm not saying that every asian woman who is white only is moving towards DEGEN values, and i'm not saying that white values are degenerate -- i'm saying that much more commonly, when an asian woman racemixes AWAY from east asian men, it comes with DEGEN values that are a further departure from East Asian norms.
i'm sure that there are at least a dozen white anons here who would tell you that they racemix with asian women because white women are increasingly blue-haired, degenerate feminazi cunts. and like, that's fine. i would racemix too if i were those white guys. and it would be based. because values.